DREVO Practical Standards, Forms and Tables
A working system for recording, monitoring, transferring responsibility and long-term storage of data
An ecological, social and economic model becomes manageable only when general principles are translated into clear working procedures.
To do this you need:
uniform standards;
standard forms;
checklists;
observation logs;
object passports;
responsibility tables;
data verification rules;
document storage procedure;
audit procedures;
forms of transfer of cases.
DREVO's practical standards must be detailed enough to ensure quality, but must not turn the activity into excessive bureaucracy.
The main principle:
Every document should facilitate decision-making, retain knowledge, or confirm responsibility. Forms that don't serve a useful purpose should be simplified or eliminated.
1. DREVO document system
The documents are divided into six main groups.
| Group | Purpose | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Strategic documents | Determine the purpose and long-term rules | Charter, strategy, intergenerational plan |
| Regulatory documents | Establish mandatory requirements | Standards, regulations, instructions |
| Project documents | Describe a specific activity | Concept, budget, implementation plan |
| Operational documents | Used in daily work | Work orders, journals, checklists |
| Accounting documents | Record objects, resources and actions | Passports, registers, statements |
| Reporting documents | Show results and deviations | Monthly, annual, environmental report |
2. Hierarchy of mandatory documents
Level 1. Founding Documents
Mandatory for the entire system:
Intergenerational Charter;
Code of Values;
environmental policy;
social standard;
financial standard;
safety standard;
data management policy.
Level 2. General Standards
Applies to all divisions:
environmental passport standard;
digital twin standard;
project management standard;
monitoring standard;
procurement standard;
standard of work with contractors;
document storage standard.
Level 3. Regional regulations
Take into account:
national legislation;
climate;
language;
local environmental conditions;
forms of ownership;
demands of government authorities.
Level 4. Object Instructions
They are created for a specific purpose:
nursery;
plot;
reservoir;
laboratories;
production site;
digital system;
restoration project.
Level 5. Working forms
Filled out directly during work performance.
3. Requirements for each standard
Each standard must contain:
Name.
Unique code.
Version.
Effective date.
Scope of application.
Target.
Terms.
Responsible persons.
Mandatory requirements.
Procedure.
Forms used.
Quality control.
Exceptions.
Revision procedure.
Version history.
4. Coding standards
Code example:
WOOD-STD-ECO-001-V1.0
Transcript:
DREVO — system;
STD — standard;
ECO — direction;
001 — number;
V1.0 — version.
Possible direction designations:
| Code | Direction |
|---|---|
| ECO | Ecology |
| SOIL | Soil |
| WATER | Water |
| PLANT | Plants |
| NURS | Nursery |
| REM | Remediation |
| DATA | Data |
| AI | Artificial intelligence |
| END | Finance |
| SOC | Social work |
| GOV | Management |
| SAFE | Safety |
| EDU | Education |
| ARCH | Archive |
| HR | Staff |
| PROC | Procurement |
5. Document statuses
| Status | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Project | The document is under development |
| Under approval | Sent to experts and responsible persons |
| Approved | Current document |
| Under review | Needs updating |
| Suspended | Temporarily not applicable |
| Cancelled | No longer valid |
| Archival | Preserved for history |
The cancelled document is not deleted.
6. Version control
Every change is recorded.
| Version | Date | Change | Author | Approved |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0 | 01.03.2026 | Original version | Name | Organ |
| 1.1 | 15.06.2026 | Added monitoring section | Name | Organ |
| 2.0 | 01.01.2028 | Complete revision | Name | Organ |
A major change increases the major version number.
A small clarification increases the additional number.
7. File naming standard
Recommended format:
Year-Month-Day_ObjectCode_DocumentType_Version_Language
Example:
2026-07-23_DREVO-CH-ZH-0001_SoilReport_V1.0_RU.pdf
It is not recommended to use the following names:
"new document";
"latest version";
"final";
"final new";
"Option 3 corrected."
8. Universal document card
| Field | Content |
|---|---|
| Document Title | |
| Code | |
| Version | |
| Status | |
| Date of creation | |
| Author | |
| Responsible | |
| Approving authority | |
| Scope of application | |
| Next revision | |
| Storage location | |
| Access level | |
| Related documents |
9. RACI Responsibility Matrix
For each task, roles are defined:
R — Responsible:does the work;
A — Accountable:bears final responsibility;
C — Consulted:participates in the approval process;
I — Informed:receives information.
Example:
| Task | Supervisor | Ecologist | Field specialist | Financier | Soviet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial examination | A | C | R | I | I |
| Project approval | R | C | C | C | A |
| Soil sampling | I | A | R | I | I |
| Budget approval | C | C | I | R | A |
| Publication of the report | A | R | C | C | I |
There should be only one main status A per task.
10. Object responsibility map
| Field | Content |
|---|---|
| Object | |
| Unique code | |
| Owner | |
| Operator | |
| Guardian | |
| Technical Responsible Person | |
| Financially responsible | |
| Supervisory authority | |
| Emergency contact | |
| Successor | |
| Next check date |
11. New object registration form
Form DREVO-FRM-OBJ-001
| Field | Data |
|---|---|
| Object type | |
| Proposed name | |
| Coordinates | |
| Territory | |
| Date of registration | |
| Origin | |
| Brief description | |
| Current status | |
| Photos are attached. | Not really |
| Responsible | |
| Access level | |
| Level of confidence | A / B / C / D / E |
| Need for examination | |
| Notes |
After registration, the object is assigned a permanent code.
12. Universal environmental passport of the facility
| Section | Mandatory information |
|---|---|
| Identification | Code, name, type |
| Geography | Coordinates, area, boundaries |
| Legal status | Ownership, lease, restrictions |
| Initial state | Date, description, photo |
| Environmental data | Soil, water, vegetation |
| History | Events, works, changes |
| Risks | Type, probability, consequences |
| Monitoring | Indicators and frequency |
| Responsible | Owner, operator, custodian |
| Documents | Protocols, maps, permits |
| Next check | Date and scope of examination |
13. Form of initial survey of the territory
General information
| Field | Data |
|---|---|
| Territory code | |
| Date of examination | |
| Examiner | |
| Weather conditions | |
| Square | |
| Current land use type | |
| Previous type of land use | |
| Accessibility of the site |
Condition of the territory
| Indicator | Rating | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Relief | ||
| Erosion | No / Low / Medium / High | |
| Soil compaction | ||
| Overwatering | ||
| Salinization | ||
| Pollution | ||
| Vegetation condition | ||
| Invasive species | ||
| Condition of water bodies | ||
| Anthropogenic load |
Initial recommendations
| Event | Urgency | Responsible |
|---|---|---|
| Low / Medium / High |
14. Soil profile description form
| Field | Data |
|---|---|
| Profile code | |
| Coordinates | |
| Date | |
| Total depth | |
| Relief type | |
| Vegetation | |
| Groundwater level |
Description of horizons
| Horizon | Depth | Color | Structure | Roots | Humidity | Inclusions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | ||||||
| B | ||||||
| C |
Additional signs
scent;
carbonate;
year;
petroleum products;
construction waste;
traces of gleying;
biological activity;
stoniness.
15. Soil sampling log
| Sample No. | Point code | Date | Time | Depth | Method | Executor | Laboratory |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Additionally, the following are recorded:
cleanliness of equipment;
container number;
storage conditions;
temperature;
transfer time;
sample chain of custody.
16. Laboratory result form
| Field | Data |
|---|---|
| Protocol number | |
| Sample number | |
| Laboratory | |
| Analysis date | |
| Method | |
| Detection limit | |
| Unit of measurement |
Results
| Indicator | Result | Norm or benchmark | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| pH | |||
| Organic matter | |||
| Electrical conductivity | |||
| Lead | |||
| Cadmium | |||
| Petroleum products |
Status:
within the landmark;
requires attention;
excess;
critical excess;
the standard has not been established.
17. Passport of the water body
| Field | Data |
|---|---|
| Code | |
| Object type | |
| Water source | |
| Coordinates | |
| Area or volume | |
| Seasonality | |
| Main use | |
| Security zone | |
| Pollution risks | |
| Responsible |
Water indicators
| Indicator | Meaning | Date | Method | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature | ||||
| pH | ||||
| Electrical conductivity | ||||
| Dissolved oxygen | ||||
| Nitrates | ||||
| Microbiology |
18. Water level and flow log
| Date | Object | Level | Tributary | Consumption | Precipitation | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
19. Plant passport
| Field | Data |
|---|---|
| Plant code | |
| Botanical name | |
| Local name | |
| Variety or ecotype | |
| Origin | |
| Genetic line | |
| Method of reproduction | |
| Planting date | |
| Coordinates | |
| Nursery | |
| Responsible |
State
| Indicator | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Height | |
| Diameter | |
| Condition of leaves | |
| Damage | |
| Water stress | |
| Diseases | |
| Pests | |
| Overall rating |
20. Tree passport
| Field | Data |
|---|---|
| Tree code | |
| View | |
| Age or age estimate | |
| Height | |
| Trunk circumference | |
| Crown diameter | |
| Condition of the bark | |
| Dry branches | |
| Hollow | |
| Slope | |
| Root zone condition | |
| Ecological value | |
| Risk level | |
| Recommended action |
21. Landing log
| Date | Plant code | View | Party | Place | Executor | Method | Watering |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Additionally:
size of the planting hole;
used substrate;
mulch;
support;
protection;
weather conditions;
photo.
22. Planting checklist
Before boarding
| Check | Yes | No | Not applicable |
|---|---|---|---|
| The species is suitable for the conditions | |||
| Origin confirmed | |||
| The roots are healthy | |||
| The place is marked | |||
| Soil tested | |||
| Water is available |
After landing
| Check | Yes | No | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| The root collar is positioned correctly | |||
| The soil is moderately compacted | |||
| Watering has been completed | |||
| Protection installed | |||
| Added mulch | |||
| The object code is fixed | |||
| The photo has been uploaded. |
23. Survival log
| Plant code | Planting date | 30-day verification | 6 month check | After winter | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Status:
Great;
mild stress;
requires care;
seriously damaged;
died;
absent;
status not confirmed.
24. Plant care journal
| Date | Object code | Work | Cause | Executor | Materials | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Types of work:
watering;
mulching;
pruning;
protection;
garter;
treatment;
weed removal;
plant replacement;
pest control.
25. Seed lot passport
| Field | Data |
|---|---|
| Party code | |
| View | |
| Variety or ecotype | |
| Gathering place | |
| Collection date | |
| Collector | |
| Mother plants | |
| Weight | |
| Quantity | |
| Humidity | |
| Germination | |
| Storage conditions | |
| Next test due date |
26. Seed bank journal
| Party code | View | Quantity | Storage location | Temperature | The last test | Germination |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
27. Nursery passport
| Section | Content |
|---|---|
| General information | Name, code, address, area |
| Production zones | Greenhouses, open ground, mother plant |
| Water sources | Type, quality, volume |
| Production capacity | By types and seasons |
| Staff | Quantity and qualifications |
| Sanitary status | Diseases, quarantine |
| Equipment | Watering, storage, transport |
| Digital system | Register of lots and plants |
| Risks | Water, energy, disease, climate |
| Backup plan | Actions in case of an accident |
28. Nursery production log
| Party | View | Sowing date | Quantity | Shoots | Picking | Readiness | Losses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
29. Nursery sanitary control log
| Date | Zone | Symptoms | Possible cause | Actions | Responsible | Re-check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
30. Passport of the contaminated site
| Field | Data |
|---|---|
| Plot code | |
| Source of pollution | |
| Estimated start date | |
| Pollutants | |
| Square | |
| Maximum depth | |
| Proximity to water | |
| Current access | |
| Risk to people | |
| Risk to animals | |
| Risk of migration | |
| Responsible |
31. Pollution map
| Zone | Square | pollutant | Concentration | Depth | Risk level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | |||||
| B | |||||
| C |
32. Phytoremediation plan
| Stage | Action | Plant species | Deadline | Outcome indicator | Responsible |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Access restriction | — | A fence has been installed | ||
| 2 | Soil stabilization | Reducing erosion | |||
| 3 | Landing | Survival rate | |||
| 4 | Monitoring | — | Decreased concentration | ||
| 5 | Biomass handling | — | Safe transfer |
33. Journal of contaminated biomass
| Date | Plot | View | Weight | pollutant | Package | Place of transfer | Document |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Such biomass should not be mixed with regular compost without confirmation of safety.
34. Project Passport
| Field | Data |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Project code | |
| Supervisor | |
| Customer | |
| Territory | |
| Target | |
| start date | |
| Planned completion date | |
| Budget | |
| Sources of funding | |
| Main risks | |
| Status |
35. Logical model of the project
| Level | Description |
|---|---|
| Problem | What state needs to be changed |
| Resources | People, money, land, knowledge |
| Actions | What will be done |
| Direct result | What is created or accomplished |
| Change | What has really improved |
| Long-term effect | What should remain |
36. Work plan
| № | Work | Start | Conclusion | Responsible | Addiction | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Status:
not started;
planned;
is being executed;
detained;
suspended;
completed;
canceled.
37. Project checkpoint registry
| Checkpoint | Planned date | Performance Criteria | Actual date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial examination | The report has been approved. | |||
| Completion of preparation | The site is ready | |||
| Landing | Planted according to the register | |||
| First audit | The report has been published |
38. Risk register
| Risk | Probability | Consequence | Level | Prevention | Responsible |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drought | High | Death of plants | Critical | Water reserve | |
| Delayed delivery | Average | Schedule shift | Average | Second supplier |
The level of assessment can be defined as a combination of probability and consequences.
39. Risk matrix
| Consequence / probability | Low | Average | High |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minor | Short | Short | Average |
| Essential | Short | Average | High |
| Critical | Average | High | Critical |
40. Problem log
| № | Date | Problem | Influence | Urgency | Responsible | Solution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A problem differs from a risk in that it has already occurred.
41. Decision Journal
| Solution code | Date | Question | Solution | Foundation | The adopting authority | Check |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
For strategic decisions, the following are additionally recorded:
alternatives;
vote;
conflict of interest;
long-term consequences;
revision conditions.
42. Intergenerational Solution Test
| Question | Answer | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Consequences after 5 years | ||
| Consequences after 30 years | ||
| Consequences after 100 years | ||
| Reversible solution | Yes / Partially / No | |
| Affects strategic assets | ||
| Creates future obligations | ||
| There is a safer alternative | ||
| A Council for Future Generations is needed |
43. Project Change Request Form
| Field | Data |
|---|---|
| Request code | |
| Initiator | |
| Date | |
| Proposed change | |
| Cause | |
| Impact on the budget | |
| Impact on timing | |
| Environmental impact | |
| Social influence | |
| Risks | |
| Solution | Approve / Reject / Revise |
44. Deviation log
| Date | Object | Requirement | Actual state | Cause | Correction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
45. Corrective action
| Field | Data |
|---|---|
| The problem identified | |
| Cause | |
| Immediate action | |
| Long-term measure | |
| Responsible | |
| Deadline | |
| Performance testing | |
| Status |
46. Form of incident
Used for:
trauma;
fire;
pollution;
damage to equipment;
death of plants;
data leakage;
conflict;
illegal access.
| Field | Data |
|---|---|
| Date and time | |
| Place | |
| Type of incident | |
| Description | |
| Victims | |
| Environmental damage | |
| Immediate action | |
| To whom reported | |
| Person in charge of the investigation | |
| Necessary measures |
47. Root Cause Investigation
It is recommended to use the following sequence of questions:
What happened?
Where did it happen?
When did it start?
How was it discovered?
Why didn't immediate protection work?
What were the systemic causes?
What actions will prevent a recurrence?
It is necessary to look not only for the culprit, but also for the flaw in the system.
48. Maintenance log
| Equipment | Code | Date | Work | Executor | Next service |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
49. Equipment passport
| Field | Data |
|---|---|
| Code | |
| Name | |
| Manufacturer | |
| Model | |
| Serial number | |
| Date of purchase | |
| Price | |
| Place of operation | |
| Responsible | |
| Service life | |
| Guarantee | |
| Maintenance schedule | |
| Criticality |
50. Sensor passport
| Field | Data |
|---|---|
| Sensor code | |
| Type | |
| Measured parameter | |
| Accuracy | |
| Range | |
| Coordinates | |
| Installation date | |
| Calibration date | |
| Power supply | |
| Transmission channel | |
| Responsible |
51. Calibration log
| Sensor | Date | Reference | Deviation | Action | Next calibration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
52. Data quality control
| Check | Status | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| The object code exists | ||
| The coordinates are indicated | ||
| Units of measurement are indicated | ||
| The date and time are correct | ||
| The data source is indicated | ||
| The methodology is indicated | ||
| Duplicates checked | ||
| Anomalies checked | ||
| The confidence level has been assigned | ||
| Confirmation document attached |
53. Levels of Confidence
| Level | Description |
|---|---|
| A | Verified by an accredited laboratory or verified professional |
| B | Documented observation with coordinates and evidence |
| C | Probable conclusion based on incomplete data |
| D | Preliminary announcement |
| AND | Historical or oral evidence |
54. Register of data sources
| Source | Type | Responsible | Periodicity | Reliability | Format |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laboratory | Tests | Annually | A | PDF / CSV | |
| Humidity sensor | Auto | Hourly | B | API | |
| Volunteer | Observation | By event | D | Photo |
55. Citizen Science Data Addition Form
| Field | Data |
|---|---|
| Observer | |
| Date | |
| Coordinates | |
| Object | |
| Observation | |
| Photo or audio | |
| Observer's confidence | |
| Consent to use | |
| Verification status |
56. Expert confirmation form
| Field | Data |
|---|---|
| Object | |
| Preliminary approval | |
| Expert | |
| Qualification | |
| Verified materials | |
| Conclusion | Confirmed / Not Confirmed / Details Required |
| Restrictions | |
| Date | |
| Signature |
57. Data Access Registry
| User | Role | Access level | Date of provision | Deadline | Approved |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
58. Access levels
| Level | Access |
|---|---|
| Public | General maps and reports |
| Interior | Working information |
| Professional | Detailed environmental data |
| Limited | Rare species, risks, personal data |
| Administrative | Changing the system and rights |
59. Critical data access log
| Date | User | Object | Action | Foundation | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| View / Edit / Export |
60. Backup registry
| Date | System | Copy type | Storage location | Verifying Recovery | Responsible |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Full / Additional |
61. Checking data recovery
A backup is considered reliable only after a test restore.
| Check | Result |
|---|---|
| The file is available. | |
| The checksum matches | |
| The base is opening | |
| Object connections are preserved | |
| Access rights have been restored | |
| Version history saved |
62. Digital Twin Passport
| Section | Content |
|---|---|
| System name | |
| Territory | |
| Data owner | |
| Operator | |
| Platform | |
| Data formats | |
| Sources | |
| Refresh rate | |
| Models | |
| Restrictions | |
| Backup | |
| Transfer plan | |
| Access levels |
63. Registry of digital models
| Model | Version | Purpose | Data | Responsible | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water balance | Water forecast | ||||
| Plant growth | Planning | ||||
| Risk of erosion | Risk map |
64. DREVO AI Result Form
| Field | Data |
|---|---|
| Model | |
| Version | |
| Analysis date | |
| Initial data | |
| Automatic withdrawal | |
| Confidence level | |
| Restrictions | |
| Expert verification required | Not really |
| Human decision | |
| Reason for the decision |
65. Automatic warning log
| Date | Object | Warning | Level | Action | Responsible | Closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
66. Financial passport of the project
| Field | Data |
|---|---|
| Budget | |
| Actual expenses | |
| Sources of funds | |
| Income | |
| Obligations | |
| Reserve | |
| Ecological Fund | |
| Social Fund | |
| Investors | |
| Payback period |
67. Project budget
| Article | Plan | Fact | Deviation | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preparing the area | ||||
| Plants | ||||
| Watering | ||||
| Staff | ||||
| Monitoring | ||||
| Equipment | ||||
| Reserve |
68. Cash flow plan
| Month | Incoming flow | Outgoing flow | Clean flow | Remainder |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| January | ||||
| February |
69. Register of funding sources
| Source | Type | Sum | Limitation | Deadline | Reporting |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grant | Targeted | Monitoring only | |||
| Investor | Investment | By contract | |||
| Cooperative | Own funds |
70. Register of obligations
| Commitment | Sum | Recipient | Deadline | Security | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
71. Result distribution table
| Direction | Percent | Sum | Solution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Development | |||
| Reserve | |||
| Ecological Fund | |||
| Social Fund | |||
| Education | |||
| Payments to participants |
Only the confirmed result after mandatory expenses and reserves is distributed.
72. Register of deposits
| Participant | Date of entry | Sum | Used | Average balance | Period of participation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
73. Calculation of average balance
For each day or billing period, the actual amount of funds that was in the system is taken into account.
| Period | Remainder | Number of days | Weighted sum |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01–10 | 10 | ||
| 11–20 | 10 | ||
| 21–30 | 10 |
Average balance:
sum of weighted balances / number of days in the period.
74. Request form for fund expenditure
| Field | Data |
|---|---|
| Fund | |
| Initiator | |
| Sum | |
| Purpose | |
| Recipient | |
| Expected result | |
| Foundation | |
| CONTROL | |
| Solution |
75. Register of purchases
| № | Goods or services | Supplier | Sum | Selection method | Contract | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
76. Supplier Evaluation Form
| Criterion | Rating 1–5 | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ||
| Quality | ||
| Reliability | ||
| Deadlines | ||
| Eco-friendliness | ||
| Social responsibility | ||
| Documentation |
77. Conflict of Interest Declaration Form
| Field | Data |
|---|---|
| Participant | |
| Decision or contract | |
| Communication with stakeholders | |
| Potential personal gain | |
| The proposed measure | Do not participate / Disclose / Submit decision |
| Authority's decision |
78. Social passport of the program
| Field | Data |
|---|---|
| Name of the program | |
| Target group | |
| Problem | |
| Number of participants | |
| Form of support | |
| Deadline | |
| Budget | |
| Expected result | |
| Indicators | |
| Responsible |
79. Social program participant form
| Field | Data |
|---|---|
| Participant code | |
| Date of inclusion | |
| Request or need | |
| Skills | |
| Restrictions | |
| Development plan | |
| Teacher | |
| Employment | |
| Next assessment |
Personal data is stored separately from public statistics.
80. Individual development plan
| Target | Action | Support | Deadline | Indicator | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Get a skill | Internship in a nursery | Teacher | 3 months | Independent work |
81. Participant's professional passport
| Skill | Level | Confirmation | Date | Expert |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Planting trees | Base | Practical test | ||
| Working with irrigation | Average | Certificate | ||
| Sampling | Admitted | Briefing |
82. Training journal
| Participant | Program | Date | Times | Result | Teacher |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
83. Form of mentoring
| Field | Data |
|---|---|
| Teacher | |
| Participant | |
| Target | |
| Period | |
| Frequency of meetings | |
| Skills | |
| Final assessment |
84. Working time log
| Date | Participant | Project | Work | Times | Type of participation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pay / Internship / Volunteering |
Volunteer hours are counted separately from paid work.
85. Form of voluntary participation
Must contain:
voluntariness;
job description;
risks;
briefing;
duration;
absence of hidden duty;
procedure for termination of participation;
insurance, if required;
consent for photos and data separately.
86. Social indicators
| Indicator | Original meaning | Target | Fact | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jobs created | ||||
| Trained participants | ||||
| Transitioned to employment | ||||
| Supported projects | ||||
| Participants of youth programs |
87. Environmental indicators
| Indicator | Unit | Original meaning | Target | Fact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The restored square | him | |||
| Survival rate | % | |||
| Soil organic matter | % | |||
| Infiltration | mm/h | |||
| Number of species | number | |||
| Pollutant level | mg/kg |
88. Economic indicators
| Indicator | Plan | Fact | Deviation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | |||
| Operating expenses | |||
| Cash flow | |||
| Reserve | |||
| Share of local purchases | |||
| Dependence on grants |
89. Monthly project report
Basic information
| Field | Data |
|---|---|
| Project | |
| Period | |
| Supervisor | |
| General status | Green / Yellow / Red |
Results of the month
completed work;
achieved indicators;
deviations;
incidents;
financial status;
solutions;
tasks for next month.
90. Status traffic light
| Color | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Green | The work is going according to plan. |
| Yellow | There are deviations, but they are manageable. |
| Red | The goal, budget, deadline or safety are at risk |
| Grey | There is not enough data |
91. Annual Integrated Report
Structure:
Management's message.
Main events.
Environmental results.
Social results.
Economic results.
Management.
Use of funds.
Risks.
Violations and errors.
Independent checks.
Next year's plan.
Long-term liabilities.
92. Internal audit form
| Question | Corresponds | Partially | Does not correspond | Proof |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The object passports are up to date | ||||
| The data has a source | ||||
| Risks have been reassessed | ||||
| Financial funds are divided | ||||
| Access is valid | ||||
| Backups have been verified | ||||
| Successors have been appointed |
93. Audit plan
| Region | Periodicity | Auditor | Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Finance | Annually | Independent auditor | |
| Ecology | Annually or in stages | Ecologist | |
| Data | Once a year | IT auditor | |
| Safety | Every 6 months | Specialist | |
| Management | Every 3-5 years | Independent Commission |
94. Audit Notes Journal
| № | Comment | Criticality | Responsible | Deadline | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
95. Register of strategic assets
| Active | Code | Owner | Guardian | Restrictions | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land plot | Prohibition of sale without consent | ||||
| Seed bank | Mandatory reservation | ||||
| Archive | Cannot be deleted |
96. Passport of a strategic asset
| Field | Data |
|---|---|
| Name | |
| Code | |
| Basis of strategic status | |
| Owner | |
| Guardian | |
| Legal restrictions | |
| Risks | |
| Backup plan | |
| Successor | |
| Next assessment |
97. Succession plan for the position
| Field | Data |
|---|---|
| Job title | |
| Current Responsible Person | |
| Critical Duties | |
| Accesses | |
| Basic knowledge | |
| Acting Deputy | |
| The main successor | |
| Reserve successor | |
| Training plan | |
| Date of inspections |
98. Form of transfer of cases
| Section | Content |
|---|---|
| Current tasks | |
| Unfinished business | |
| Critical deadlines | |
| Agreements | |
| Financial obligations | |
| Accesses | |
| Risks | |
| Contacts | |
| Archives | |
| Recommendations for the successor |
The transfer is confirmed by the transferor, the recipient and the controlling person.
99. Critical Dependencies Registry
| Addiction | Type | Risk | Alternative | Responsible |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| One source of water | Physical | High | Tank | |
| One specialist | Personnel | High | Preparing a successor | |
| One server | Digital | Critical | Backup system |
100. Business Continuity Plan
| Critical function | Maximum downtime | Backup mode | Responsible |
|---|---|---|---|
| Watering the nursery | 12 o'clock | Backup pump | |
| Seed storage | 2 hours | Backup power supply | |
| Access to data | 24 hours | Local copy |
101. Crisis Action Plan
| Stage | Action | Responsible | Deadline |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Protect people | Immediately | |
| 2 | Stop the source of damage | Immediately | |
| 3 | Protect water and land | ||
| 4 | Save collections | ||
| 5 | Notify the authorities | ||
| 6 | Document the damage | ||
| 7 | Start recovery |
102. Facility emergency card
| Field | Data |
|---|---|
| Object | |
| Address | |
| Coordinates | |
| Emergency contact | |
| Hazardous substances | |
| Water source | |
| Electricity | |
| Fire extinguishing equipment | |
| Evacuation | |
| Particularly valuable objects |
103. Exercise log
| Date | Scenario | Participants | Result | Flaws | Correction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
104. Calendar of mandatory inspections
| Check | Frequency |
|---|---|
| Plant condition | By season |
| Soil indicators | Annually or according to the program |
| Water quality | On risk and legislation |
| Sensors | According to the calibration schedule |
| Equipment | According to the instructions |
| Access rights | Every 6 months |
| Risks | Quarterly |
| Continuity | Annually |
| Strategic assets | Every 3-5 years |
| Charter and Mission | Every 10-15 years |
105. Annual operating calendar
| Month | Ecology | Production | Training | Management |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| January | Data analysis | Planning | Winter courses | Budget |
| February | Sample preparation | Crops | Briefing | Procurement |
| March | Examinations | Nursery | Practice | Report |
| April | Landings | Production | Volunteers | CONTROL |
| May | Monitoring | Care | Field studies | Audit |
| June | Water | Collection | Training | Analysis |
| July | Drought | Watering | Internships | Risks |
| August | Fire control | Collection | Seminars | Planning |
| September | Seeds | Recycling | Schools | Budget |
| October | Autumn plantings | Storage | Practice | Audit |
| November | Inventory | Repair | Analysis of the year | Strategy |
| December | Final data | Preparation | Reports | Annual report |
The calendar adapts to the region and climate.
106. Checklist for opening a new project
| Check | Status |
|---|---|
| The goal has been defined | |
| A manager has been appointed | |
| The boundaries have been defined | |
| A baseline examination was conducted | |
| The budget has been approved | |
| Those responsible have been appointed | |
| A risk register has been created | |
| The indicators have been determined | |
| The project passport has been created | |
| Digital archive opened | |
| Permits received | |
| The monitoring plan has been approved |
107. Project Closure Checklist
| Check | Status |
|---|---|
| The work is completed | |
| Obligations fulfilled | |
| The area is safe | |
| Data loaded | |
| Finances are closed | |
| Assets transferred | |
| A person responsible for care has been appointed | |
| The final report has been approved. | |
| Errors are documented | |
| The archive has been saved. |
108. Final project evaluation form
| Question | Rating | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| The goal has been achieved | ||
| The ecological effect has been confirmed | ||
| Social effect confirmed | ||
| The budget is met | ||
| Risks were managed | ||
| Data saved | ||
| The result is sustainable | ||
| Continuation required |
109. Lessons Learned Form
| Section | Content |
|---|---|
| What worked | |
| What didn't work | |
| What was underestimated | |
| What data was missing | |
| What decisions were wrong? | |
| What needs to be repeated | |
| What should not be repeated | |
| Recommendations for other projects |
110. Error archive
| Code | Date | Error | Cause | Consequence | Lesson |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The error archive is not used to humiliate employees. Its purpose is to prevent the recurrence of system errors.
111. Minimum documentation package for a small project
For a small project, it is enough:
The project passport.
Maps of the territory.
Initial examination.
Register of objects.
Work plan.
Budget.
Risk register.
Event log.
Expense journal.
Final report.
112. Minimum package of documentation for a long-term territory
Required:
Ecological passport.
Digital twin.
Soil and water passports.
Plant registry.
Register of strategic assets.
History of land use.
Monitoring plan.
Risk management plan.
Succession plan.
Continuity plan.
Archive of solutions.
Financial care plan.
Intergenerational plan.
Protocol for transfer to the next operator.
113. Minimum nursery package
Nursery passport.
Zone map.
Register of parties.
Seed journal.
Sanitary control journal.
Watering log.
Production log.
Equipment register.
Emergency water supply plan.
Conservation plan for queen cell collections.
Register of personnel and permits.
Shipment log.
114. Minimum phytoremediation package
Passport of the contaminated site.
Pollution map.
Laboratory protocols.
Risk assessment.
Access restriction plan.
Phytoremediation plan.
Register of landings.
Monitoring log.
Journal of Contaminated Biomass.
Waste management plan.
Final expert opinion.
Long-term control plan.
115. Minimum package of social program
Social passport of the program.
Inclusion criteria.
Participant's consent.
Individual plan.
Training journal.
Employment journal.
Evaluation of the result.
Data protection rules.
Complaints procedure.
Final social report.
116. Minimum investment project package
Business model.
Budget.
Cash flow plan.
Risk register.
Agreements.
Financial passport.
Environmental restrictions.
Social obligations.
The procedure for investor exit.
The order of distribution of the result.
Independent financial control.
Loss Action Plan.
117. Rules for filling out forms
Forms must be completed:
timely;
legibly;
without deleting the original data;
with indication of the author;
with date and time;
in established units;
with attached confirmations;
with the designation of unknown values.
An unknown value is indicated by:
"not measured";
"no data available";
"not applicable";
"requires verification."
A blank cell should not be used unless it is clear why it is not filled in.
118. Rules for correcting entries
In paper form:
the incorrect value is crossed out with one line;
the ability to read the original record remains;
the correction is indicated next to it;
the date and signature are put.
In the digital system:
the previous version is saved;
the author of the change is recorded;
the reason is indicated.
119. Mandatory units of measurement
It is necessary to approve units in advance for:
lengths;
area;
volume;
masses;
temperatures;
humidity;
concentrations;
water consumption;
energy;
time;
financial.
Units cannot be mixed in the same table without explicit designation.
120. Color coding
Color is used as an additional, but not the only, means of designation.
| Status | Color | Text designation |
|---|---|---|
| Norm | Green | Normal |
| Attention | Yellow | Requires control |
| Danger | Red | Action required |
| No data | Grey | Unknown |
| Completed | Blue | Completed |
For accessibility, text is always used, not just color.
121. Levels of urgency
| Level | Response time |
|---|---|
| Critical | Immediately |
| High | Up to 24 hours |
| Average | Up to 7 days |
| Short | As planned |
| Observation | Without immediate action |
122. Photography standard
Each photograph should contain, if possible:
object code;
date;
coordinates;
shooting direction;
author;
description;
scale;
connection with the event.
For repeated monitoring, permanent survey points are used.
123. Mapping standard
Each card indicates:
Name;
territory;
date;
coordinate system;
scale;
legend;
north direction;
data source;
author;
version;
restrictions on use.
124. Meeting standard
Every work meeting should have:
target;
agenda;
participants;
start and end time;
solutions;
responsible;
deadlines;
list of open questions.
125. Minutes of the meeting
| Question | Discussion | Solution | Responsible | Deadline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
126. Participant's proposal form
| Field | Data |
|---|---|
| Author | |
| Problem | |
| Proposal | |
| Expected benefits | |
| Required resources | |
| Risks | |
| Possible pilot | |
| Solution |
127. Complaint form
| Field | Data |
|---|---|
| Date | |
| Applicant | |
| Description | |
| Affected persons | |
| Previous attempts at solution | |
| Desired result | |
| Confidentiality | |
| Responsible for review | |
| Solution |
Anonymous reports may also be considered if they contain verifiable information.
128. Form of mediation
| Field | Data |
|---|---|
| Parties | |
| Mediator | |
| Subject of conflict | |
| Side position 1 | |
| Side position 2 | |
| Common interests | |
| Agreed decision | |
| Verification period |
129. Consent to data processing
Must separately define:
what data is collected;
For what;
where they are stored;
who has access;
shelf life;
right to correction;
the right to withdraw consent;
exceptions established by law.
Consent to participate should not automatically mean consent to public use of photographs.
130. Personal data protection checklist
| Check | Status |
|---|---|
| Only necessary data is collected | |
| The goal has been defined | |
| Consent received | |
| Access is restricted | |
| The shelf life has been set | |
| Backups are protected | |
| Public data is anonymized | |
| Removal is possible |
131. Document storage standard
| Category | Minimum term |
|---|---|
| Operational journals | According to legislation and project needs |
| Financial documents | According to the country's requirements |
| Environmental baseline data | Indefinitely |
| Passports of strategic assets | Indefinitely |
| Laboratory protocols | Long term |
| Agreements | Contract term plus mandatory period |
| History of decisions | Indefinitely |
| Personal data | Only the necessary period |
Legal deadlines are specified for each country.
132. Storage matrix
| Document | Paper | Local copy | Cloud | External archive |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constitution | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Laboratory data | If necessary | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Work log | No | Yes | Yes | By deadline |
| Rare Species Map | Limited | Yes | Yes | Yes |
133. Procedure for annual review of documents
A list of valid documents is being compiled.
Relevance is being checked.
Those responsible are appointed.
Outdated provisions are updated.
Conflicts between documents are resolved.
New versions are being approved.
Old versions are archived.
Participants are notified of changes.
134. Criteria for simplification of form
The form is subject to revision if:
most fields are not used;
data is duplicated;
employees fill it out formally;
information is not used in decisions;
filling out takes a disproportionately long time;
the form is incomprehensible to field specialists;
There is a more reliable automatic source.
135. Field minimum set
A field specialist must have:
map;
list of objects;
mobile app or paper forms;
instructions;
measuring instruments;
marking;
camera or phone;
security means;
contact of the person in charge;
procedure to follow in case of an incident.
136. Daily Field Report
| Field | Data |
|---|---|
| Date | |
| Team | |
| Territory | |
| Completed works | |
| Number of objects | |
| Weather conditions | |
| Materials used | |
| Problems | |
| Incidents | |
| Work for tomorrow |
137. End of Workday Checklist
| Check | Status |
|---|---|
| All works are registered | |
| Photos have been uploaded | |
| The tools have been returned. | |
| Hazardous materials have been removed. | |
| Water is turned off or checked | |
| The area is safe | |
| The issues have been escalated to management. | |
| Data is synchronized |
138. Key Performance Indicator Standard
Each indicator must have:
Name;
target;
unit;
measurement method;
data source;
periodicity;
responsible person;
original value;
target value;
tolerance;
response order.
139. Scorecard
| Field | Data |
|---|---|
| Indicator | |
| Definition | |
| Unit | |
| Formula | |
| Source | |
| Frequency | |
| Responsible | |
| Base value | |
| Target | |
| Warning threshold |
140. Example of survival rate
| Field | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Indicator | Survival rate of plantings |
| Unit | % |
| Calculation | Live plants / total quantity × 100 |
| Check | After the first season and winter |
| Target | Not less than the value established by the project |
| Responsible | Site Manager |
| Action on rejection | Root cause analysis and corrective plan |
141. Project Manager Panel
Minimum set of indicators:
| Direction | Indicator |
|---|---|
| Deadlines | Share of completed work |
| Finance | Budget rejection |
| Ecology | Key environmental indicators |
| Social model | Jobs and training |
| Safety | Number of incidents |
| Risks | Number of critical risks |
| Data | Completeness of passports |
| Quality | Number of open rejections |
142. Long-term management panel
| Block | Indicator |
|---|---|
| Earth | Share of protected areas |
| Water | Stability of sources |
| Genetic fund | Reservation of collections |
| Knowledge | Completeness of archives |
| People | Prepared successors |
| Finance | Size of reserves |
| Infrastructure | State of critical facilities |
| Management | Relevance of the charter and powers |
143. Integral passport of the year
| Section | Result |
|---|---|
| Key achievements | |
| Major losses | |
| Ecological state | |
| Financial status | |
| Social outcome | |
| Critical risks | |
| Status of assets | |
| Transferred knowledge | |
| Management changes | |
| Next year's commitments |
144. Letter to the next team
Recommended structure:
What we got.
What we changed.
What we managed to save.
What was lost.
What problems remain unresolved.
What data requires verification.
What obligations remain?
What decisions should not be repeated.
What we recommend to continue.
What the new generation has the right to change.
145. Minimum quality standard of documentation
Documentation is considered to be of high quality if it:
understandable to a new employee;
contains the data source;
has an author and date;
associated with a real object;
shows the history of changes;
allows you to check the solution;
does not hide uncertainty;
protected from loss;
can be passed on to the next generation.
146. Practical sequence of implementation
The first stage
Create:
code system;
register of documents;
object passports;
event log;
responsibility matrix;
structure of the digital archive.
The second stage
Implement:
ecological forms;
financial tables;
social passports;
risk register;
regular reporting.
The third stage
Link data to:
GIS;
digital twin;
sensors;
WOOD Plant ID;
TREE AI.
The fourth stage
Develop:
intergenerational forms;
succession plans;
register of strategic assets;
long-term archive;
independent audit system.
147. The "single entry" principle
The same data must be entered only once.
For example:
the plant code is created in the nursery;
When transferred, it is automatically transferred to the territory passport;
landing details are added as an event;
monitoring updates the same object;
Financial expenses are associated with the boarding party.
This reduces errors and duplication.
148. The principle of table relationships
Each table must use persistent identifiers:
project code;
area code;
object code;
participant code;
contract code;
event code;
sample code.
This allows you to combine information without overlapping names.
149. The principle of traceability
For each result there must be a chain:
result → measurement → method → performer → original object → completed work → resources used → decision made.
150. Final standard
A practical DREVO system should answer five questions:
What exists? The answer is provided by registers and passports.
What's happening? The answer comes from logs and monitoring.
Who is responsible? The answer is provided by responsibility matrices.
Why was the decision made? The answer is provided by the protocols and decision logs.
What is passed on next? The answer lies in the archive, the digital twin, and forms of continuity.
Properly organized documentation is not an archive of the past, but a tool for managing the present and the basis for responsibility for the future.
DREVO forms and tables should gradually become part of a unified digital system. At the same time, the ability to store critical data on paper, offline, and openly should be maintained.
The primary goal of standards is not to increase the number of documents, but to create a unified memory in which natural changes, human labor, financial decisions, and long-term obligations are linked into a single, verifiable system.
